Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.15
Change+$0.22 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets51.98M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.95
Change-$0.08 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FFBFX (52M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than FIDSX: FFBFX (2.01) vs FIDSX (1.36). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. FIDSX (35.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 39.10 vs. FIDSX (25.90). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 134.96 vs. FFBFX (43.51).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.459 | 7.737 | 122% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 52M | 1.09B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.01 | 1.36 | 148% |
| Returns for 1 year | 39.10 | 25.90 | 151% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.89 | 59.77 | 43% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.51 | 134.96 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.56 | 97.40 | 8% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement