Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBFX vs FIDSX
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs FIDSX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$29.21
Change-$0.35 (-1.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets49.94M
Fidelity Select Financials Port
Price$15.86
Change-$0.21 (-1.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.09B
FFBFX vs FIDSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. FIDSX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and FIDSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FIDSX has more cash in the bank: 1.09B vs. FFBFX (49.9M). FIDSX pays higher dividends than FFBFX: FIDSX (1.36) vs FFBFX (0.00). FFBFX was incepted earlier than FIDSX: FFBFX (15 years) vs FIDSX (44 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than FIDSX (0.69). FIDSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 35.00 vs. FFBFX (32.00). FIDSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFBFX: FIDSX (0) vs FFBFX (2000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.67 vs. FIDSX (17.99). FIDSX return over 5 years is better than : 108.34 vs. FFBFX (25.41).
| FFBFX | FIDSX | FFBFX / FIDSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.69 | 264% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.518 | 6.594 | 160% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 49.9M | 1.09B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.67 | 17.99 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.24 | 40.25 | 18% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.41 | 108.34 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.52 | 93.48 | 7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement