Ad is loading...
FFBFX vs TFIFX
FFBFX vs TFIFX Comparison
Open Charts FFBFX vs TFIFX
Emerald Finance & Bking Innovt Fd I
Price$24.22
Change+$1.52 (+6.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets41.9M
T. Rowe Price Financial Services I
Price$40.41
Change+$2.98 (+7.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.62B
FFBFX vs TFIFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBFX vs. TFIFX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBFX is a Buy and TFIFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TFIFX has more cash in the bank: 1.62B vs. FFBFX (41.9M). FFBFX pays higher dividends than TFIFX: FFBFX (2.17) vs TFIFX (1.23). FFBFX was incepted earlier than TFIFX: FFBFX (15 years) vs TFIFX (8 years). FFBFX (1.82) is less costly to investors than TFIFX (0.82). FFBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 56.00 vs. TFIFX (46.90). FFBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than TFIFX: FFBFX (2000) vs TFIFX (500000). FFBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.60 vs. TFIFX (-2.79). TFIFX return over 5 years is better than : 89.91 vs. FFBFX (20.44).
| FFBFX | TFIFX | FFBFX / TFIFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.79 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.82 | 0.82 | 222% |
| Fund Existence | 15 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -14.113 | -11.971 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 500000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 41.9M | 1.62B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.17 | 1.23 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.60 | -2.79 | -236% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.71 | 15.39 | -206% |
| Returns for 5 years | 20.44 | 89.91 | 23% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...