Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBSX vs FFSDX
FFBSX vs FFSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBSX vs. FFSDX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBSX is a Hold and FFSDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFSDX has more cash in the bank: 2.06B vs. FFBSX (368M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than FFSDX: FFBSX (1.50) vs FFSDX (1.40). FFBSX was incepted earlier than FFSDX: FFBSX (6 years) vs FFSDX (6 years). FFSDX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.50). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFSDX (12.00). FFBSX (0) and FFSDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFBSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.54 vs. FFSDX (8.48). FFBSX return over 5 years is better than : 54.51 vs. FFSDX (51.02).
| FFBSX | FFSDX | FFBSX / FFSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.530 | 5.446 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 368M | 2.06B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.50 | 1.40 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.54 | 8.48 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.92 | 44.36 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.51 | 51.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement