Ad is loading...
FFBSX vs FFSDX
FFBSX vs FFSDX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBSX vs. FFSDX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBSX is a Hold and FFSDX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFSDX has more cash in the bank: 1.86B vs. FFBSX (322M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than FFSDX: FFBSX (1.58) vs FFSDX (1.48). FFBSX was incepted earlier than FFSDX: FFBSX (6 years) vs FFSDX (6 years). FFSDX (0.65) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.50). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. FFSDX (12.00). FFBSX (0) and FFSDX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFSDX (6.89) and FFBSX (6.61) have marching annual gain over last year. FFBSX (51.25) and FFSDX (49.73) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFBSX | FFSDX | FFBSX / FFSDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.304 | 0.000 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 322M | 1.86B | 17% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.58 | 1.48 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.61 | 6.89 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 22.54 | 19.68 | 115% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.25 | 49.73 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |