Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFBSX vs RDLTX
FFBSX vs RDLTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFBSX vs. RDLTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBSX is a Hold and RDLTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDLTX has more cash in the bank: 5.25B vs. FFBSX (444M). FFBSX pays higher dividends than RDLTX: FFBSX (1.39) vs RDLTX (0.73). FFBSX was incepted earlier than RDLTX: FFBSX (6 years) vs RDLTX (5 years). RDLTX (0.74) is less costly to investors than FFBSX (0.47). FFBSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 16.00 vs. RDLTX (4.00). FFBSX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDLTX: FFBSX (0) vs RDLTX (250). RDLTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.19 vs. FFBSX (17.16). RDLTX return over 5 years is better than : 61.79 vs. FFBSX (53.38).
| FFBSX | RDLTX | FFBSX / RDLTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.74 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.47 | 0.74 | 64% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 5 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.262 | 14.943 | 102% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 444M | 5.25B | 8% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.39 | 0.73 | 190% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.16 | 18.19 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.18 | 48.51 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 53.38 | 61.79 | 86% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers