FFBW
Price
$14.09
Change
-$0.11 (-0.77%)
Updated
Jun 4 closing price
Capitalization
59.82M
GSBX
Price
$25.34
Change
+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Updated
Jun 2 closing price
Capitalization
3.28M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs GSBX

Header iconFFBW vs GSBX Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs GSBXBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$14.09
Change-$0.11 (-0.77%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization59.82M
Golden State Ban
Price$25.34
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization3.28M
FFBW vs GSBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. GSBX commentary
Jun 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a StrongBuy and GSBX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 05, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $14.09 vs. GSBX: $25.34)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and GSBX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 17% vs. GSBX: 244%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $59.82M vs. GSBX: $3.28M
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.82M. GSBX’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $3.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGSBX’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GSBX’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, GSBX is a better buy in the long-term than FFBW.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +2.55% price change this week, while GSBX (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBW is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.60% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFBW($59.8M) has a higher market cap than GSBX($3.28M). FFBW YTD gains are higher at: -1.053 vs. GSBX (-8.559).
FFBWGSBXFFBW / GSBX
Capitalization59.8M3.28M1,823%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.053-8.55912%
P/E Ratio25.91N/A-
Revenue12.8MN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW vs GSBX: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
GSBX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3837
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
44
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1615
SMR RATING
1..100
6024
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4230
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GSBX's Valuation (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBW (81) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GSBX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

GSBX's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (16) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GSBX’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

GSBX's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFBW (60) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GSBX’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as GSBX (51) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to GSBX’s over the last 12 months.

GSBX's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (42) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that GSBX’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HWCIX29.35N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Disciplined Value I
BSMAX16.30N/A
N/A
iShares Russell Small/Mid-Cap Idx Inv A
MXPBX12.16N/A
N/A
Empower International Index Instl
HNACX117.50N/A
N/A
Harbor Capital Appreciation Retirement
FVLZX33.87N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Value Z

GSBX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GSBX has been loosely correlated with CCBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GSBX jumps, then CCBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GSBX
1D Price
Change %
GSBX100%
N/A
CCBC - GSBX
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
OTPBF - GSBX
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
FFBW - GSBX
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.77%
PONT - GSBX
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ITCFY - GSBX
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More