FFBW
Price
$13.95
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
59.82M
INBC
Price
$11.75
Change
+$0.45 (+3.98%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
139.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs INBC

Header iconFFBW vs INBC Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs INBCBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$13.95
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization59.82M
InBankshares
Price$11.75
Change+$0.45 (+3.98%)
Volume$100
Capitalization139.61M
FFBW vs INBC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. INBC commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a Hold and INBC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $13.95 vs. INBC: $11.75)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and INBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 351% vs. INBC: 16%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $59.82M vs. INBC: $139.61M
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.82M. INBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $139.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFBW and INBC are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBW’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBW’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • INBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBW is a better buy in the short-term than INBC.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while INBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.05%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.10% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INBC($140M) has a higher market cap than FFBW($59.8M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than INBC: FFBW (41.03) vs INBC (18.95). INBC YTD gains are higher at: 32.919 vs. FFBW (-2.037). FFBW has less debt than INBC: FFBW (3M) vs INBC (37.5M). INBC has higher revenues than FFBW: INBC (52.4M) vs FFBW (11.7M).
FFBWINBCFFBW / INBC
Capitalization59.8M140M43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-2.03732.919-6%
P/E Ratio41.0318.95216%
Revenue11.7M52.4M22%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3M37.5M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
86
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
87
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
50
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
55

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBWINBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
23%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
30%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
39%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
56%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
22%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
41%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PTOAF0.470.01
+2.41%
CAVVY ENERGY LTD.
ETCMY0.92N/A
+0.03%
Eutelsat Communications
SHPMF1.53N/A
N/A
Shanghai Pharmaceuticals Holdings Co., Ltd.
UNTN21.00N/A
N/A
United Tennessee Bankshares, Inc.
RHHBF330.00-7.95
-2.35%
Roche Holding Ltd

FFBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBW has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFBW jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBW
1D Price
Change %
FFBW100%
N/A
GSBX - FFBW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RVSB - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.53%
OVBC - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
CNBB - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFBI - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.53%
More

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
N/A
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CNBB - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - INBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More