FFBW
Price
$14.10
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
60.55M
INBC
Price
$11.75
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Oct 3 closing price
Capitalization
139.61M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs INBC

Header iconFFBW vs INBC Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs INBCBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$14.10
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$500
Capitalization60.55M
InBankshares
Price$11.75
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$247
Capitalization139.61M
FFBW vs INBC Comparison Chart in %
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. INBC commentary
Oct 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a Hold and INBC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $14.10 vs. INBC: $11.75)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and INBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 9% vs. INBC: 14%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $60.55M vs. INBC: $139.61M
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $60.55M. INBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $139.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileINBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • INBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, INBC is a better buy in the long-term than FFBW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBW’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while INBC’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • INBC’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, INBC is a better buy in the short-term than FFBW.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.76% price change this week, while INBC (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.54%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.44% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
INBC($140M) has a higher market cap than FFBW($60.5M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than INBC: FFBW (41.53) vs INBC (18.95). INBC YTD gains are higher at: 32.919 vs. FFBW (-0.983). FFBW has less debt than INBC: FFBW (3M) vs INBC (37.5M). INBC has higher revenues than FFBW: INBC (52.4M) vs FFBW (11.7M).
FFBWINBCFFBW / INBC
Capitalization60.5M140M43%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.98332.919-3%
P/E Ratio41.5318.95219%
Revenue11.7M52.4M22%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3M37.5M8%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
16
SMR RATING
1..100
88
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
56
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
45
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBWINBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
14%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
24%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
7%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
19%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
37%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
INBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HNTIF4.56N/A
N/A
Hunting Group Plc.
MGDDY18.30N/A
N/A
CIE GENERALE DES ETABLISSEMENTS MICHELIN SA CLERMONT-FERRAND
DGCMF0.03N/A
-1.71%
DIGITAL COMMODITIES INC.
MRMD0.16-0.01
-3.06%
MariMed Inc.
MZDAF6.64-0.87
-11.58%
Mazda Motor Corp.

INBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that INBC and KGTFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that INBC and KGTFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To INBC
1D Price
Change %
INBC100%
N/A
KGTFF - INBC
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.14%
CNBB - INBC
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MVLY - INBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BNMDF - INBC
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More