FFBW
Price
$13.45
Change
+$0.04 (+0.30%)
Updated
Jun 24 closing price
Capitalization
59.82M
ITCFY
Price
$14.46
Change
-$2.24 (-13.41%)
Updated
Jun 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs ITCFY

Header iconFFBW vs ITCFY Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs ITCFYBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$13.45
Change+$0.04 (+0.30%)
Volume$2.35K
Capitalization59.82M
Investec
Price$14.46
Change-$2.24 (-13.41%)
Volume$178
Capitalization1.57B
FFBW vs ITCFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. ITCFY commentary
Jun 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a StrongBuy and ITCFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $13.45 vs. ITCFY: $14.46)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and ITCFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 22% vs. ITCFY: 113%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $59.82M vs. ITCFY: $1.57B
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.82M. ITCFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITCFY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFBW is a better buy in the long-term than ITCFY.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а -2.61% price change this week, while ITCFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.99%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.61%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFBW is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2025.

ITCFY is expected to report earnings on May 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.99% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($1.57B) has a higher market cap than FFBW($59.8M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: FFBW (25.91) vs ITCFY (5.69). FFBW YTD gains are higher at: -5.548 vs. ITCFY (-11.296). FFBW has less debt than ITCFY: FFBW (20M) vs ITCFY (20.1B). ITCFY has higher revenues than FFBW: ITCFY (19.1B) vs FFBW (12.8M).
FFBWITCFYFFBW / ITCFY
Capitalization59.8M1.57B4%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-5.548-11.29649%
P/E Ratio25.915.69455%
Revenue12.8M19.1B0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt20M20.1B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW vs ITCFY: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
ITCFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9496
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
76
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2138
SMR RATING
1..100
842
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5880
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4880
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFBW's Valuation (76) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (94) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (38) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

ITCFY's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFBW (84) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (80) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's P/E Growth Rating (48) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (80) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ARKX22.730.24
+1.07%
ARK Space Exploration & Innovation ETF
EDZ5.47N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily MSCI Em Mkts Bear 3X ETF
OMFL56.59-0.19
-0.33%
Invesco Russell 1000® Dynamic Mltfct ETF
FYT49.60-0.48
-0.96%
First Trust Small Cap Val AlphaDEX® ETF
ONEY106.70-1.27
-1.18%
SPDR® Russell 1000® Yield Focus ETF

FFBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBW has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFBW jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBW
1D Price
Change %
FFBW100%
N/A
GSBX - FFBW
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PWOD - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.43%
RVSB - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.36%
OVBC - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.23%
CNBB - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITCFY has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITCFY jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
OTPBF - ITCFY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - ITCFY
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFBW - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - ITCFY
10%
Poorly correlated
+4.82%
IITSF - ITCFY
7%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
More