FFBW
Price
$13.97
Change
+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
59.91M
ITCFY
Price
$14.50
Change
-$0.70 (-4.61%)
Updated
Aug 19 closing price
Capitalization
6.69B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFBW vs ITCFY

Header iconFFBW vs ITCFY Comparison
Open Charts FFBW vs ITCFYBanner chart's image
FFBW
Price$13.97
Change+$0.02 (+0.14%)
Volume$276
Capitalization59.91M
Investec
Price$14.50
Change-$0.70 (-4.61%)
Volume$205
Capitalization6.69B
FFBW vs ITCFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFBW vs. ITCFY commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFBW is a StrongBuy and ITCFY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFBW: $13.97 vs. ITCFY: $14.50)
Brand notoriety: FFBW and ITCFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFBW: 14% vs. ITCFY: 50%
Market capitalization -- FFBW: $59.91M vs. ITCFY: $6.69B
FFBW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $59.91M. ITCFY’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.69B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFBW’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileITCFY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FFBW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ITCFY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, ITCFY is a better buy in the long-term than FFBW.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFBW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ITCFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFBW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • ITCFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFBW is a better buy in the short-term than ITCFY.

Price Growth

FFBW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while ITCFY (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.64%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ITCFY($6.69B) has a higher market cap than FFBW($59.9M). FFBW has higher P/E ratio than ITCFY: FFBW (41.10) vs ITCFY (7.67). FFBW YTD gains are higher at: -1.879 vs. ITCFY (-9.990). ITCFY has higher revenues than FFBW: ITCFY (2.12B) vs FFBW (11.7M).
FFBWITCFYFFBW / ITCFY
Capitalization59.9M6.69B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.879-9.99019%
P/E Ratio41.107.67536%
Revenue11.7M2.12B1%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFBW vs ITCFY: Fundamental Ratings
FFBW
ITCFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8686
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
10
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
178
SMR RATING
1..100
8711
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5561
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5071
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ITCFY's Valuation (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFBW (91) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

ITCFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the null industry is in the same range as FFBW (17) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ITCFY’s stock grew similarly to FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

ITCFY's SMR Rating (11) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFBW (87) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that ITCFY’s stock grew significantly faster than FFBW’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (61) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

FFBW's P/E Growth Rating (50) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as ITCFY (71) in the null industry. This means that FFBW’s stock grew similarly to ITCFY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFBWITCFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
17%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 16 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
24%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
22%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
2%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFBW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
ITCFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SETH7.800.05
+0.65%
ProShares Short Ether ETF
IYRI50.640.23
+0.46%
NEOS Real Estate High Income ETF
NPFI26.22-0.01
-0.02%
Nuveen Preferred and Income ETF
DLS79.04-0.22
-0.28%
WisdomTree International SmallCp Div ETF
CHIQ22.51-0.77
-3.31%
Global X MSCI China Consumer Disc ETF

FFBW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFBW has been loosely correlated with GSBX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFBW jumps, then GSBX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFBW
1D Price
Change %
FFBW100%
N/A
GSBX - FFBW
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.23%
RVSB - FFBW
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.59%
OVBC - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.48%
CNBB - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFBI - FFBW
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
More

ITCFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ITCFY has been loosely correlated with OTPBF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 43% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ITCFY jumps, then OTPBF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ITCFY
1D Price
Change %
ITCFY100%
N/A
OTPBF - ITCFY
43%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GSBX - ITCFY
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.23%
FFBW - ITCFY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JFBC - ITCFY
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.71%
IITSF - ITCFY
7%
Poorly correlated
-1.39%
More