FFDF
Price
$36.00
Change
-$0.49 (-1.34%)
Updated
Aug 4 closing price
Capitalization
25.35M
FFMR
Price
$66.99
Change
+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Updated
Aug 1 closing price
Capitalization
440.55M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFDF vs FFMR

Header iconFFDF vs FFMR Comparison
Open Charts FFDF vs FFMRBanner chart's image
FFD Financial
Price$36.00
Change-$0.49 (-1.34%)
Volume$342
Capitalization25.35M
First Farmers Financial
Price$66.99
Change+$0.01 (+0.01%)
Volume$100
Capitalization440.55M
FFDF vs FFMR Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFDF vs. FFMR commentary
Aug 08, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFDF is a Buy and FFMR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 08, 2025
Stock price -- (FFDF: $36.00 vs. FFMR: $66.99)
Brand notoriety: FFDF and FFMR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFDF: 53% vs. FFMR: 20%
Market capitalization -- FFDF: $25.35M vs. FFMR: $440.55M
FFDF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $25.35M. FFMR’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $440.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.06B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFDF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFFMR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFDF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FFMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFDF is a better buy in the long-term than FFMR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFDF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFMR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFDF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FFMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMR is a better buy in the short-term than FFDF.

Price Growth

FFDF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while FFMR (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.12% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMR($441M) has a higher market cap than FFDF($25.4M). FFDF YTD gains are higher at: 11.967 vs. FFMR (1.575). FFDF has less debt than FFMR: FFDF (13M) vs FFMR (61.3M). FFMR has higher revenues than FFDF: FFMR (111M) vs FFDF (9.17M).
FFDFFFMRFFDF / FFMR
Capitalization25.4M441M6%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.9671.575760%
P/E RatioN/A10.41-
Revenue9.17M111M8%
Total CashN/A86.7M-
Total Debt13M61.3M21%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFDF vs FFMR: Fundamental Ratings
FFDF
FFMR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
242
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3419
SMR RATING
1..100
4337
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3040
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFDF's Valuation (83) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (88). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (34). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as FFDF (43). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to FFDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (54). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFDF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (40). This means that FFDF’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFDFFFMR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
21%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
21%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
33%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ALID0.01N/A
N/A
Allied Corp.
AZIHF35.92N/A
N/A
Azimut Holding Spa
OBIIF34.50N/A
N/A
Obic Co. Ltd.
COPJF0.17N/A
N/A
AMPLITUDE ENERGY LTD
IDIG0.04N/A
N/A
International Digital Holding, Inc.

FFDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFDF and BHDB have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFDF and BHDB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFDF
1D Price
Change %
FFDF100%
N/A
BHDB - FFDF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UNTN - FFDF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFWC - FFDF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - FFDF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMH - FFDF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMR and MBKL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMR and MBKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMR
1D Price
Change %
FFMR100%
N/A
MBKL - FFMR
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.12%
BKUT - FFMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOMC - FFMR
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FFMR
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFMR
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More