Ad is loading...
FFEFX vs RMFCX
FFEFX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts FFEFX vs RMFCX
Nuveen Dividend Value R6
Price$13.78
Change+$0.19 (+1.40%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.87B
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.01
Change+$0.55 (+1.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets96.25B
FFEFX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFEFX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFEFX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 96.2B vs. FFEFX (2.87B). FFEFX pays higher dividends than RMFCX: FFEFX (1.55) vs RMFCX (1.34). FFEFX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: FFEFX (12 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FFEFX (0.65). FFEFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 79.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFEFX: RMFCX (250) vs FFEFX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.37 vs. FFEFX (-8.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 50.63 vs. FFEFX (34.11).
| FFEFX | RMFCX | FFEFX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 0.91 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.91 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -6.675 | -3.599 | 185% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.87B | 96.2B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.55 | 1.34 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | -8.90 | 1.37 | -649% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.84 | 7.19 | -81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.11 | 50.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 10 years | -9.58 | 51.64 | -19% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...