Ad is loading...
FFFCX vs FRQAX
FFFCX vs FRQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFCX vs. FRQAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFCX is a Hold and FRQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFCX has more cash in the bank: 3.11B vs. FRQAX (5.91M). FFFCX pays higher dividends than FRQAX: FFFCX (2.93) vs FRQAX (2.68). FFFCX was incepted earlier than FRQAX: FFFCX (29 years) vs FRQAX (18 years). FRQAX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FFFCX (0.48). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FFFCX (13.00). FFFCX (0) and FRQAX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.44 vs. FRQAX (7.01). FRQAX return over 5 years is better than : 8.70 vs. FFFCX (8.18).
| FFFCX | FRQAX | FFFCX / FRQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.70 | 69% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.70 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.441 | 2.498 | 98% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 5.91M | 52,613% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.68 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 7.01 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 8.25 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.18 | 8.70 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.65 | 2.82 | 271% |