Ad is loading...
FFFCX vs FSNKX
FFFCX vs FSNKX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFCX vs. FSNKX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFCX is a Hold and FSNKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFCX (3.11B) and FSNKX (3.11B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FSNKX (2.98) and FFFCX (2.93) have matching dividends . FFFCX was incepted earlier than FSNKX: FFFCX (29 years) vs FSNKX (8 years). FFFCX (0.48) is less costly to investors than FSNKX (0.43). FFFCX (13.00) and FSNKX (13.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFFCX (0) and FSNKX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FSNKX (7.51) and FFFCX (7.44) have marching annual gain over last year. FFFCX (8.18) and FSNKX (8.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFFCX | FSNKX | FFFCX / FSNKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.43 | 112% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 0.43 | 112% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.441 | 2.443 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.11B | 3.11B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 2.98 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.44 | 7.51 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.81 | 8.96 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | 8.18 | 8.02 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 7.65 | N/A | - |