Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFFX vs RBKTX
FFFFX vs RBKTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFFX vs. RBKTX commentary
Jun 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFFX is a Hold and RBKTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBKTX has more cash in the bank: 47.3B vs. FFFFX (29B). FFFFX pays higher dividends than RBKTX: FFFFX (1.32) vs RBKTX (0.55). FFFFX was incepted earlier than RBKTX: FFFFX (25 years) vs RBKTX (18 years). RBKTX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FFFFX (0.66). FFFFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. RBKTX (6.00). FFFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RBKTX: FFFFX (0) vs RBKTX (250). RBKTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.09 vs. FFFFX (8.45). RBKTX return over 5 years is better than : 42.41 vs. FFFFX (38.06).
| FFFFX | RBKTX | FFFFX / RBKTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 1.45 | 46% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.137 | 7.812 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29B | 47.3B | 61% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.32 | 0.55 | 238% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.45 | 10.09 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.23 | 32.28 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 42.41 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 36.98 | 63.68 | 58% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers