Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFMX vs GCLSX
FFFMX vs GCLSX Comparison
Open Charts FFFMX vs GCLSX
FFFMX vs GCLSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFMX vs. GCLSX commentary
Aug 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFMX is a Hold and GCLSX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFFMX has more cash in the bank: 118B vs. GCLSX (771M). FFFMX pays higher dividends than GCLSX: FFFMX (1.67) vs GCLSX (0.51). FFFMX was incepted earlier than GCLSX: FFFMX (6 years) vs GCLSX (28 years). GCLSX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FFFMX (0.32). GCLSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 213.00 vs. FFFMX (30.00). GCLSX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFFMX: GCLSX (0) vs FFFMX (250). GCLSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.30 vs. FFFMX (8.94). FFFMX return over 5 years is better than : 40.70 vs. GCLSX (15.61).
| FFFMX | GCLSX | FFFMX / GCLSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.06 | 30% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.13 | 28% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.997 | 19.423 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 118B | 771M | 15,305% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.51 | 327% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.94 | 19.30 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 38.99 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 40.70 | 15.61 | 261% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 85.84 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers