Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFZX vs RCHTX
FFFZX vs RCHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFZX vs. RCHTX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFZX is a Hold and RCHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCHTX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. FFFZX (2.11B). FFFZX pays higher dividends than RCHTX: FFFZX (1.03) vs RCHTX (0.79). FFFZX was incepted earlier than RCHTX: FFFZX (19 years) vs RCHTX (18 years). RCHTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFFZX (0.94). FFFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RCHTX (5.00). FFFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCHTX: FFFZX (0) vs RCHTX (250). RCHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.41 vs. FFFZX (7.19). RCHTX return over 5 years is better than : 41.88 vs. FFFZX (36.41).
| FFFZX | RCHTX | FFFZX / RCHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.01 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.01 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.416 | 10.425 | 71% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 41.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 0.79 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 10.41 | 69% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.41 | 40.06 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.41 | 41.88 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.19 | 73.61 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement