Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFZX vs RCHTX
FFFZX vs RCHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFZX vs. RCHTX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFZX is a Hold and RCHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RCHTX has more cash in the bank: 43.4B vs. FFFZX (2.17B). FFFZX pays higher dividends than RCHTX: FFFZX (1.00) vs RCHTX (0.77). FFFZX was incepted earlier than RCHTX: FFFZX (19 years) vs RCHTX (19 years). RCHTX (1.01) is less costly to investors than FFFZX (0.94). FFFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RCHTX (5.00). FFFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RCHTX: FFFZX (0) vs RCHTX (250). RCHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.38 vs. FFFZX (13.21). RCHTX return over 5 years is better than : 44.90 vs. FFFZX (38.20).
| FFFZX | RCHTX | FFFZX / RCHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.01 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 1.01 | 93% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.034 | 15.782 | 83% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.17B | 43.4B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.00 | 0.77 | 129% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.21 | 15.38 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.70 | 44.51 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.20 | 44.90 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.05 | 94.88 | 57% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers