Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFFZX vs RDHTX
FFFZX vs RDHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFFZX vs. RDHTX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFFZX is a Hold and RDHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RDHTX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. FFFZX (2.11B). FFFZX (1.03) and RDHTX (1.02) have matching dividends . FFFZX was incepted earlier than RDHTX: FFFZX (19 years) vs RDHTX (18 years). FFFZX (0.94) is less costly to investors than RDHTX (0.71). FFFZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. RDHTX (5.00). FFFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than RDHTX: FFFZX (0) vs RDHTX (250). RDHTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.79 vs. FFFZX (7.19). RDHTX return over 5 years is better than : 43.57 vs. FFFZX (36.41).
| FFFZX | RDHTX | FFFZX / RDHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.94 | 0.71 | 132% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.416 | 10.614 | 70% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.11B | 41.9B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.03 | 1.02 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.19 | 10.79 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.41 | 41.02 | 116% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.41 | 43.57 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 35.19 | 76.27 | 46% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement