Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FNCSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.15
Change-$0.05 (-0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.56M
Franklin Natural Resources R6
Price$34.56
Change-$0.06 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets330.32M
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FNCSX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and FNCSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. FNCSX (330M). FNCSX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: FNCSX (2.45) vs FFGTX (1.78). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FNCSX: FFGTX (16 years) vs FNCSX (12 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FNCSX (0.67). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNCSX (19.72). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCSX: FFGTX (0) vs FNCSX (1000000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.35 vs. FNCSX (6.00). FNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 128.68 vs. FFGTX (100.23).
| FFGTX | FNCSX | FFGTX / FNCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.61 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.67 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.535 | 11.502 | 109% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 888M | 330M | 269% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.45 | 73% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.35 | 6.00 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.87 | 36.31 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 100.23 | 128.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | 102.25 | 40.90 | 250% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement