Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs FNCSX
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs FNCSX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.13
Change+$0.07 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834.61M
Franklin Natural Resources R6
Price$30.98
Change+$0.25 (+0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.38M
FFGTX vs FNCSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. FNCSX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and FNCSX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. FNCSX (293M). FNCSX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: FNCSX (2.72) vs FFGTX (1.94). FFGTX was incepted earlier than FNCSX: FFGTX (16 years) vs FNCSX (12 years). FFGTX (1.40) is less costly to investors than FNCSX (0.67). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. FNCSX (11.86). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FNCSX: FFGTX (0) vs FNCSX (1000000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -5.95 vs. FNCSX (-6.65). FNCSX return over 5 years is better than : 122.72 vs. FFGTX (97.26).
| FFGTX | FNCSX | FFGTX / FNCSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.61 | 230% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 0.67 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.613 | -0.049 | -1,262% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 293M | 285% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 2.72 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -5.95 | -6.65 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.24 | 13.83 | 2% |
| Returns for 5 years | 97.26 | 122.72 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | 51.54 | 2.33 | 2,216% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers