Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs IGNAX
FFGTX vs IGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs IGNAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.00
Change-$0.76 (-4.05%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets876.47M
Macquarie Natural Resources A
Price$14.51
Change-$0.76 (-4.98%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets168.89M
FFGTX vs IGNAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. IGNAX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a StrongBuy and IGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 876M vs. IGNAX (169M). IGNAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: IGNAX (5.62) vs FFGTX (1.87). FFGTX was incepted earlier than IGNAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs IGNAX (28 years). IGNAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. IGNAX (37.00). IGNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNAX: FFGTX (0) vs IGNAX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.26 vs. IGNAX (-2.89). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 141.88 vs. IGNAX (116.85).
| FFGTX | IGNAX | FFGTX / IGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.36 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.68 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.513 | 2.552 | 177% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 876M | 169M | 518% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.87 | 5.62 | 33% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.26 | -2.89 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | -7.82 | -4.82 | 162% |
| Returns for 5 years | 141.88 | 116.85 | 121% |
| Returns for 10 years | 67.17 | 3.86 | 1,740% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers