Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs IGNAX
FFGTX vs IGNAX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs IGNAX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.04
Change+$0.05 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.15M
Macquarie Natural Resources A
Price$17.10
Change+$0.03 (+0.18%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets177.2M
FFGTX vs IGNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. IGNAX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and IGNAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 878M vs. IGNAX (177M). IGNAX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: IGNAX (5.14) vs FFGTX (1.77). FFGTX was incepted earlier than IGNAX: FFGTX (16 years) vs IGNAX (29 years). IGNAX (1.68) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and IGNAX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. IGNAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNAX: FFGTX (0) vs IGNAX (1000). IGNAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.51 vs. FFGTX (7.11). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 90.55 vs. IGNAX (79.02).
| FFGTX | IGNAX | FFGTX / IGNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.36 | 103% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 1.68 | 83% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 29 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.365 | 14.842 | 77% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 177M | 496% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 5.14 | 34% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 11.51 | 62% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.67 | 14.34 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.55 | 79.02 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.51 | 32.14 | 313% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement