Ad is loading...
FFGTX vs IGNCX
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs IGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$18.38
Change+$0.25 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets834.61M
Macquarie Natural Resources C
Price$11.90
Change+$0.13 (+1.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets161.46M
FFGTX vs IGNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. IGNCX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and IGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 835M vs. IGNCX (161M). IGNCX pays higher dividends than FFGTX: IGNCX (6.69) vs FFGTX (1.94). FFGTX was incepted earlier than IGNCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs IGNCX (28 years). IGNCX (2.45) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 49.00 vs. IGNCX (37.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than IGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs IGNCX (1000). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -6.59 vs. IGNCX (-8.05). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 98.03 vs. IGNCX (67.11).
| FFGTX | IGNCX | FFGTX / IGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.11 | 66% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.45 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.003 | 0.762 | 132% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 1000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 835M | 161M | 519% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.94 | 6.69 | 29% |
| Returns for 1 year | -6.59 | -8.05 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.10 | 0.32 | 30% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.03 | 67.11 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 52.13 | -7.86 | -663% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...