Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs RGNCX
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$19.99
Change-$0.14 (-0.70%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets878.15M
Victory Global Energy Transition C
Price$34.74
Change-$0.02 (-0.06%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets375.28M
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RGNCX commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and RGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 878M vs. RGNCX (375M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than RGNCX: FFGTX (1.77) vs RGNCX (1.04). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs RGNCX (18 years). RGNCX (3.36) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFGTX (49.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 42.97 vs. FFGTX (7.11). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 304.63 vs. FFGTX (90.55).
| FFGTX | RGNCX | FFGTX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.28 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.36 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.365 | 28.266 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 878M | 375M | 234% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.04 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.11 | 42.97 | 17% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.67 | 38.48 | 25% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.55 | 304.63 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 100.51 | 98.50 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement