Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs RGNCX
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs RGNCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$21.71
Change+$0.03 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets927.58M
Victory Global Energy Transition C
Price$41.57
Change+$0.30 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets453.52M
FFGTX vs RGNCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. RGNCX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and RGNCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 928M vs. RGNCX (454M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than RGNCX: FFGTX (1.61) vs RGNCX (0.87). FFGTX was incepted earlier than RGNCX: FFGTX (17 years) vs RGNCX (18 years). RGNCX (3.36) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). RGNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFGTX (49.00). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than RGNCX: FFGTX (0) vs RGNCX (2500). RGNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 47.52 vs. FFGTX (14.01). RGNCX return over 5 years is better than : 410.44 vs. FFGTX (108.84).
| FFGTX | RGNCX | FFGTX / RGNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 2.28 | 61% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.36 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 20.780 | 52.288 | 40% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 928M | 454M | 204% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.61 | 0.87 | 184% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.01 | 47.52 | 29% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.13 | 67.13 | 34% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.84 | 410.44 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 125.32 | 129.81 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement