Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SBMBX
FFGTX vs SBMBX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SBMBX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$20.61
Change-$0.13 (-0.63%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets895.5M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials A
Price$12.16
Change-$0.20 (-1.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01M
FFGTX vs SBMBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SBMBX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Buy and SBMBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 895M vs. SBMBX (1.01M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SBMBX: FFGTX (1.67) vs SBMBX (0.81). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SBMBX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SBMBX (28 years). SBMBX (3.81) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SBMBX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. SBMBX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFGTX (4%) vs FFGTX (4%). FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBMBX: FFGTX (0) vs SBMBX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.13 vs. SBMBX (0.24). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 98.91 vs. SBMBX (76.53).
| FFGTX | SBMBX | FFGTX / SBMBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.81 | 37% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 3.81 | 37% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.543 | 7.013 | 222% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 61% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 895M | 1.01M | 88,264% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 0.81 | 207% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.13 | 0.24 | 5,804% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.03 | 15.58 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 98.91 | 76.53 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 127.67 | 25.93 | 492% |