Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFGTX vs SEPCX
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FFGTX vs SEPCX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stk M
Price$19.90
Change-$0.23 (-1.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets887.56M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$9.77
Change+$0.18 (+1.88%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.01M
FFGTX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGTX vs. SEPCX commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGTX is a Hold and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFGTX has more cash in the bank: 888M vs. SEPCX (1.01M). FFGTX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FFGTX (1.78) vs SEPCX (1.55). FFGTX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FFGTX (16 years) vs SEPCX (23 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FFGTX (1.40). FFGTX (49.00) and SEPCX (47.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFGTX has a lower initial minimum investment than SEPCX: FFGTX (0) vs SEPCX (250). FFGTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.80 vs. SEPCX (-5.53). FFGTX return over 5 years is better than : 108.62 vs. SEPCX (73.14).
| FFGTX | SEPCX | FFGTX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.40 | 4.85 | 29% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.145 | 4.064 | 299% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 888M | 1.01M | 87,747% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.55 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.80 | -5.53 | -105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.13 | 18.18 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 108.62 | 73.14 | 149% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.43 | -2.10 | -4,220% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement