Ad is loading...
FFGZX vs LIRPX
FFGZX vs LIRPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFGZX vs. LIRPX commentary
May 12, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFGZX is a Hold and LIRPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LIRPX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. FFGZX (1.71B). FFGZX pays higher dividends than LIRPX: FFGZX (3.14) vs LIRPX (2.62). FFGZX was incepted earlier than LIRPX: FFGZX (10 years) vs LIRPX (7 years). LIRPX (0.43) is less costly to investors than FFGZX (0.08). LIRPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. FFGZX (12.00). LIRPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFGZX: LIRPX (1000) vs FFGZX (5000000). LIRPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.97 vs. FFGZX (6.29). LIRPX return over 5 years is better than : 23.16 vs. FFGZX (12.53).
| FFGZX | LIRPX | FFGZX / LIRPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.39 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 0.43 | 19% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.207 | 1.965 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000 | 500,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.71B | 13.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.14 | 2.62 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.29 | 6.97 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.39 | 16.91 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.53 | 23.16 | 54% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers