Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs FFRHX
FFHCX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFHCX vs. FFRHX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFHCX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. FFHCX (262M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than FFRHX: FFHCX (8.45) vs FFRHX (7.57). FFHCX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: FFHCX (14 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). FFRHX (0.73) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). FFHCX (43.00) and FFRHX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFHCX (0) and FFRHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFHCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.26 vs. FFRHX (5.76). FFHCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.39 vs. FFRHX (38.06).
| FFHCX | FFRHX | FFHCX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.73 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.73 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.984 | 3.571 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 500 | - |
| Net Assets | 262M | 15.2B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.45 | 7.57 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.26 | 5.76 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.21 | 29.73 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 41.39 | 38.06 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.86 | 65.11 | 115% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement