Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs PFFRX
FFHCX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFHCX vs. PFFRX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFHCX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.68B vs. FFHCX (250M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: FFHCX (9.06) vs PFFRX (7.93). FFHCX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FFHCX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FFHCX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.36 vs. FFHCX (6.73). FFHCX return over 5 years is better than : 46.24 vs. PFFRX (40.04).
| FFHCX | PFFRX | FFHCX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.70 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.604 | 1.512 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 250M | 4.68B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 9.06 | 7.93 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.73 | 7.36 | 91% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.78 | 27.66 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 46.24 | 40.04 | 115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 64.11 | 58.48 | 110% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement