Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs PFFRX
FFHCX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFHCX vs. PFFRX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFHCX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.8B vs. FFHCX (254M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: FFHCX (8.90) vs PFFRX (7.70). FFHCX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FFHCX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FFHCX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX (7.78) and FFHCX (7.64) have marching annual gain over last year. FFHCX return over 5 years is better than : 44.28 vs. PFFRX (39.07).
| FFHCX | PFFRX | FFHCX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.70 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.768 | 2.476 | 71% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 254M | 4.8B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.90 | 7.70 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.64 | 7.78 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.97 | 30.38 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.28 | 39.07 | 113% |
| Returns for 10 years | 66.39 | 59.64 | 111% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement