Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFHCX vs PFFRX
FFHCX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFHCX vs. PFFRX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFHCX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PFFRX has more cash in the bank: 4.98B vs. FFHCX (258M). FFHCX pays higher dividends than PFFRX: FFHCX (8.68) vs PFFRX (7.49). FFHCX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FFHCX (14 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). PFFRX (0.70) is less costly to investors than FFHCX (0.03). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.50 vs. FFHCX (43.00). FFHCX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FFHCX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX (8.26) and FFHCX (8.16) have marching annual gain over last year. FFHCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.78 vs. PFFRX (37.42).
| FFHCX | PFFRX | FFHCX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.70 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.03 | 0.70 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.946 | 3.701 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 258M | 4.98B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.68 | 7.49 | 116% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.16 | 8.26 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.93 | 28.74 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 42.78 | 37.42 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 69.74 | 61.41 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement