FFIC
Price
$13.96
Change
+$0.11 (+0.79%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
471.55M
30 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$31.81
Change
-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
221.95M
24 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFIC vs FSFG

Header iconFFIC vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts FFIC vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Flushing Financial
Price$13.96
Change+$0.11 (+0.79%)
Volume$179.21K
Capitalization471.55M
First Savings Financial Group
Price$31.81
Change-$0.65 (-2.00%)
Volume$86.37K
Capitalization221.95M
FFIC vs FSFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFIC vs. FSFG commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIC is a StrongBuy and FSFG is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FFIC: $13.96 vs. FSFG: $31.81)
Brand notoriety: FFIC and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFIC: 76% vs. FSFG: 443%
Market capitalization -- FFIC: $471.55M vs. FSFG: $221.95M
FFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $471.55M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $221.95M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFIC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FFIC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFIC and FSFG are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSFG is a better buy in the short-term than FFIC.

Price Growth

FFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.62% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +15.97% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2025.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFIC($472M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($222M). FFIC has higher P/E ratio than FSFG: FFIC (16.09) vs FSFG (10.26). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 22.012 vs. FFIC (2.893). FSFG has less debt than FFIC: FSFG (464M) vs FFIC (650M). FFIC has higher revenues than FSFG: FFIC (154M) vs FSFG (80.6M).
FFICFSFGFFIC / FSFG
Capitalization472M222M213%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.89322.01213%
P/E Ratio16.0910.26157%
Revenue154M80.6M191%
Total CashN/A18.6M-
Total Debt650M464M140%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6824
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
36
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7238
SMR RATING
1..100
5047
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4841
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3391
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFIC's Valuation (36) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (38). This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIC (72). This means that FSFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's SMR Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (50). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (48). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FSFG (91). This means that FFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFICFSFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
52%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGPSX79.740.79
+1.00%
ProFunds Mid Cap Growth Svc
JLVZX21.740.16
+0.74%
JPMorgan Large Cap Value R2
BNUEX12.090.07
+0.58%
UBS International Sustainable Equity P
GSPTX37.970.18
+0.48%
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Equity Inv
BDAUX32.340.07
+0.22%
Baron Durable Advantage R6

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
+0.79%
UBSI - FFIC
83%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
OCFC - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
TCBK - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.38%
STBA - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
WASH - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with UBSI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then UBSI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
-2.00%
UBSI - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.08%
OCFC - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.06%
AUB - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.95%
SMBK - FSFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
FFIC - FSFG
44%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More