FFIC
Price
$12.16
Change
-$0.08 (-0.65%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
366.54M
67 days until earnings call
HWC
Price
$54.54
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
May 22 closing price
Capitalization
4B
60 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFIC vs HWC

Header iconFFIC vs HWC Comparison
Open Charts FFIC vs HWCBanner chart's image
Flushing Financial
Price$12.16
Change-$0.08 (-0.65%)
Volume$151.63K
Capitalization366.54M
Hancock Whitney
Price$54.54
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$503
Capitalization4B
FFIC vs HWC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFIC vs. HWC commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFIC is a Buy and HWC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (FFIC: $12.16 vs. HWC: $54.54)
Brand notoriety: FFIC and HWC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFIC: 53% vs. HWC: 0%
Market capitalization -- FFIC: $366.54M vs. HWC: $4B
FFIC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $366.54M. HWC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFIC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHWC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFIC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HWC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HWC is a better buy in the long-term than FFIC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFIC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HWC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFIC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HWC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFIC is a better buy in the short-term than HWC.

Price Growth

FFIC (@Regional Banks) experienced а -6.46% price change this week, while HWC (@Regional Banks) price change was -4.32% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.44%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFIC is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

HWC is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.88% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HWC($4B) has a higher market cap than FFIC($367M). FFIC has higher P/E ratio than HWC: FFIC (13.08) vs HWC (9.98). HWC YTD gains are higher at: 0.501 vs. FFIC (-13.381). FFIC has less debt than HWC: FFIC (882M) vs HWC (1.52B). HWC has higher revenues than FFIC: HWC (1.37B) vs FFIC (202M).
FFICHWCFFIC / HWC
Capitalization367M4B9%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-13.3810.501-2,671%
P/E Ratio13.089.98131%
Revenue202M1.37B15%
Total CashN/A561M-
Total Debt882M1.52B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFIC vs HWC: Fundamental Ratings
FFIC
HWC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6573
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
16
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
8023
SMR RATING
1..100
118
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6149
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3259
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FFIC's Valuation (16) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HWC (56). This means that FFIC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HWC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFIC (80). This means that HWC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's SMR Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (11). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

HWC's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FFIC (61). This means that HWC’s stock grew similarly to FFIC’s over the last 12 months.

FFIC's P/E Growth Rating (32) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as HWC (59). This means that FFIC’s stock grew similarly to HWC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFICHWC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFIC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HWC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GAM53.240.17
+0.32%
General American Investors Company
CADNZD1.22N/A
N/A
Canadian Dollar - New Zealand Dollar
RISR37.44N/A
N/A
FolioBeyond Alt Inc and Int Rt Hdg ETF
XHYF37.50N/A
N/A
BondBloxx US Hg Yld Fncl & REIT Str ETF
IDLV32.82-0.01
-0.02%
Invesco S&P Intl Dev Low Vol ETF

FFIC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFIC has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFIC jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFIC
1D Price
Change %
FFIC100%
-0.65%
TCBK - FFIC
82%
Closely correlated
N/A
OCFC - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
-1.00%
STEL - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
BY - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
EQBK - FFIC
81%
Closely correlated
N/A
More

HWC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HWC has been closely correlated with ASB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HWC jumps, then ASB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HWC
1D Price
Change %
HWC100%
N/A
ASB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
N/A
FNB - HWC
93%
Closely correlated
+0.80%
ABCB - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
-0.50%
SNV - HWC
92%
Closely correlated
+0.68%
ONB - HWC
91%
Closely correlated
+0.39%
More