Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLG vs IWF
FFLG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FFLG vs IWF
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Gr ETF
Price$29.50
Change-$0.16 (-0.54%)
Volume$34.96K
Net Assets508.22M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$469.94
Change-$1.78 (-0.38%)
Volume$805.83K
Net Assets122.26B
FFLG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLG vs. IWF commentary
Oct 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLG is a Hold and IWF is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 122B vs. FFLG (508M). FFLG (17.703) and IWF (17.371) have matching annual dividend yield . FFLG was incepted earlier than IWF: FFLG (5 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FFLG (0.38). FFLG has a higher turnover IWF (13.00) vs IWF (13.00).
| FFLG | IWF | FFLG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 17.703 | 17.371 | 102% |
| Net Assets | 508M | 122B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.18 | 211% |
| Turnover | 52.00 | 13.00 | 400% |
| Yield | 0.08 | 0.35 | 23% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 89% | 4 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 78% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLG | 100% | -0.54% | ||
| NVDA - FFLG | 82% Closely correlated | -0.67% | ||
| AMZN - FFLG | 80% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| META - FFLG | 79% Closely correlated | -2.27% | ||
| ETN - FFLG | 77% Closely correlated | -0.88% | ||
| ARES - FFLG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.19% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | -0.38% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +0.01% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -1.30% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -3.31% | ||
More | ||||