84 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs GTLB
FFLS vs GTLB Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs GTLB
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.69
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets40.54M
GitLab
Price$49.81
Change-$0.49 (-0.97%)
Volume$6.64K
Capitalization8.39B
FFLS vs GTLB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. GTLB commentary
Sep 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Buy and GTLB is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | GTLB | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 59% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 45% | 4 days ago 89% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 55% | 4 days ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 51% | 12 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 68% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 4 days ago 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ASIYX | 31.82 | 0.12 | +0.38% |
| Invesco Asia Pacific Equity Y | |||
| GCTCX | 46.95 | -0.12 | -0.25% |
| Goldman Sachs US Tax-Managed Eq C | |||
| ICAFX | 66.96 | -0.20 | -0.30% |
| American Funds Invmt Co of Amer F2 | |||
| ARVIX | 13.03 | -0.04 | -0.31% |
| ARGA International Value Institutional | |||
| OSVCX | 17.85 | -0.20 | -1.11% |
| JPMorgan Small Cap Value C | |||
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -0.29% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.37% | ||
| META - FFLS | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.85% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.43% | ||
| GTLB - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.13% | ||
More | ||||
GTLB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GTLB has been loosely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GTLB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GTLB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GTLB | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| PATH - GTLB | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.48% | ||
| HUBS - GTLB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.07% | ||
| ZS - GTLB | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.21% | ||
| NTNX - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.33% | ||
| TEAM - GTLB | 59% Loosely correlated | -1.04% | ||
More | ||||