Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.43
Change+$0.12 (+0.47%)
Volume$1.86K
Net Assets40.96M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.68
Change-$0.16 (-0.57%)
Volume$2.24K
Net Assets19.53M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Aug 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a Hold and LSEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 41M vs. LSEQ (19.5M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: FFLS (10.447) vs LSEQ (1.071). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (2 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). LSEQ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 10.447 | 1.071 | 975% |
| Net Assets | 41M | 19.5M | 210% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 88.00 | 194.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 56% | 2 days ago 71% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 68% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 23 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 52% | 2 days ago 55% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.51% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 67% Closely correlated | -0.86% | ||
| META - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.40% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 58% Loosely correlated | -3.53% | ||
| DASH - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.23% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 56% Loosely correlated | +3.89% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSEQ has been loosely correlated with OGE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSEQ jumps, then OGE could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| OGE - LSEQ | 33% Loosely correlated | -1.27% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -1.41% | ||
| CNP - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.30% | ||
| EXC - LSEQ | 30% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
More | ||||