Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLS vs LSEQ
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs LSEQ
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$25.68
Change+$0.04 (+0.16%)
Volume$5.64K
Net Assets41.62M
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
Price$27.86
Change+$0.03 (+0.11%)
Volume$625
Net Assets19.51M
FFLS vs LSEQ Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. LSEQ commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a StrongBuy and LSEQ is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFLS has more net assets: 41.6M vs. LSEQ (19.5M). FFLS has a higher annual dividend yield than LSEQ: FFLS (11.533) vs LSEQ (1.733). FFLS was incepted earlier than LSEQ: FFLS (2 years) vs LSEQ (2 years). FFLS (1.24) has a lower expense ratio than LSEQ (1.98). LSEQ has a higher turnover FFLS (88.00) vs FFLS (88.00).
| FFLS | LSEQ | FFLS / LSEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 11.533 | 1.733 | 666% |
| Net Assets | 41.6M | 19.5M | 213% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.24 | 1.98 | 63% |
| Turnover | 88.00 | 194.00 | 45% |
| Yield | 0.16 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | LSEQ | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 53% | 16 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 74% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | +0.18% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 69% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.42% | ||
| META - FFLS | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| CRM - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.53% | ||
| GTLS - FFLS | 57% Loosely correlated | +0.76% | ||
More | ||||
LSEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LSEQ has been loosely correlated with NI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LSEQ jumps, then NI could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LSEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LSEQ | 100% | +0.12% | ||
| NI - LSEQ | 35% Loosely correlated | +0.67% | ||
| OGE - LSEQ | 33% Poorly correlated | -0.13% | ||
| ECL - LSEQ | 32% Poorly correlated | +0.71% | ||
| WMB - LSEQ | 32% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| CNP - LSEQ | 31% Poorly correlated | +1.37% | ||
More | ||||