Ad is loading...
31 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...
FFLS vs MU
FFLS vs MU Comparison
Open Charts FFLS vs MU
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
Price$23.47
Change-$0.38 (-1.59%)
Volume$2.58K
CapitalizationN/A
Micron Technology
Price$96.34
Change-$2.84 (-2.86%)
Volume$18.52M
CapitalizationN/A
FFLS vs MU Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLS vs. MU commentary
Nov 18, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLS is a StrongSell and MU is a Sell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
MU: Fundamental Ratings
MU | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 79 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 43 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLS | MU | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 73% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 66% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 86% | 11 days ago 71% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 55% | 3 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLS has been loosely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLS jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLS | 100% | -1.59% | ||
| NVDA - FFLS | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.26% | ||
| ASML - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | -4.95% | ||
| MU - FFLS | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.86% | ||
| PWR - FFLS | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
| NFLX - FFLS | 52% Loosely correlated | -1.59% | ||
More | ||||
MU and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MU has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MU jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y