Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFLV vs IWD
FFLV vs IWD Comparison
Open Charts FFLV vs IWD
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
Price$23.20
Change-$0.03 (-0.13%)
Volume$100
Net Assets11.58M
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Price$202.10
Change-$0.23 (-0.11%)
Volume$8.54K
Net Assets65.43B
FFLV vs IWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFLV vs. IWD commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFLV is a Hold and IWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWD has more net assets: 65.4B vs. FFLV (11.6M). IWD has a higher annual dividend yield than FFLV: IWD (10.736) vs FFLV (9.936). FFLV was incepted earlier than IWD: FFLV (2 years) vs IWD (26 years). IWD (0.18) has a lower expense ratio than FFLV (0.38). FFLV has a higher turnover IWD (15.00) vs IWD (15.00).
| FFLV | IWD | FFLV / IWD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.936 | 10.736 | 93% |
| Net Assets | 11.6M | 65.4B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.38 | 0.18 | 211% |
| Turnover | 44.00 | 15.00 | 293% |
| Yield | 1.70 | 1.72 | 99% |
| Fund Existence | 2 years | 26 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFLV | IWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 63% | 2 days ago 66% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 83% | 8 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
FFLV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFLV has been loosely correlated with WSC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFLV jumps, then WSC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFLV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFLV | 100% | +0.17% | ||
| WSC - FFLV | 50% Loosely correlated | -5.29% | ||
| GTM - FFLV | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| GILD - FFLV | 6% Poorly correlated | +2.49% | ||
| NOC - FFLV | 4% Poorly correlated | +0.66% | ||
| VSTS - FFLV | 1% Poorly correlated | +5.41% | ||
More | ||||
IWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWD has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWD jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y