Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs LTGRX
FFMFX vs LTGRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMFX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. LTGRX (93.2M). FFMFX pays higher dividends than LTGRX: FFMFX (4.47) vs LTGRX (2.98). FFMFX was incepted earlier than LTGRX: FFMFX (5 years) vs LTGRX (14 years). LTGRX (2.24) is less costly to investors than FFMFX (0.48). FFMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 824.00 vs. LTGRX (32.26). LTGRX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFMFX: LTGRX (0) vs FFMFX (250). FFMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. LTGRX (6.02). LTGRX return over 5 years is better than : 3.15 vs. FFMFX (-1.85).
| FFMFX | LTGRX | FFMFX / LTGRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 0.67 | 64% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 2.24 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.597 | 5.956 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 93.2M | 13,090% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.47 | 2.98 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 6.02 | 127% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 14.01 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.85 | 3.15 | -59% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.50 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement