Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMFX vs RMABX
FFMFX vs RMABX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMFX (12.2B) and RMABX (12.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFMFX pays higher dividends than RMABX: FFMFX (4.47) vs RMABX (3.55). FFMFX was incepted earlier than RMABX: FFMFX (5 years) vs RMABX (15 years). RMABX (1.41) is less costly to investors than FFMFX (0.48). FFMFX (824.00) and RMABX (824.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFMFX (250) and RMABX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.68 vs. RMABX (6.71). FFMFX return over 5 years is better than : -1.85 vs. RMABX (-6.45).
| FFMFX | RMABX | FFMFX / RMABX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.43 | 1.36 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.48 | 1.41 | 34% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.597 | 6.679 | 114% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 12.2B | 12.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.47 | 3.55 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.68 | 6.71 | 114% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.64 | 10.39 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.85 | -6.45 | 29% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 0.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers