FFMH
Price
$44.40
Change
+$0.30 (+0.68%)
Updated
Aug 26 closing price
Capitalization
177.48M
VALIF
Price
$118.35
Change
+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.59B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMH vs VALIF

Header iconFFMH vs VALIF Comparison
Open Charts FFMH vs VALIFBanner chart's image
First Farmers & Merchants
Price$44.40
Change+$0.30 (+0.68%)
Volume$9.27K
Capitalization177.48M
Valiant Holding Bern
Price$118.35
Change+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Volume$162
Capitalization2.59B
FFMH vs VALIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMH vs. VALIF commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMH is a Buy and VALIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMH: $44.40 vs. VALIF: $118.35)
Brand notoriety: FFMH and VALIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMH: 564% vs. VALIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FFMH: $177.48M vs. VALIF: $2.59B
FFMH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $177.48M. VALIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $170.51B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMH’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVALIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMH’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VALIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMH is a better buy in the long-term than VALIF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMH’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFMH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 2 bearish.

Price Growth

FFMH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.68% price change this week, while VALIF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.63%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALIF($2.59B) has a higher market cap than FFMH($177M). VALIF (10.21) and FFMH (10.07) have similar P/E ratio . FFMH YTD gains are higher at: 28.663 vs. VALIF (5.672). FFMH has less debt than VALIF: FFMH (10M) vs VALIF (10.9B). VALIF has higher revenues than FFMH: VALIF (551M) vs FFMH (62.9M).
FFMHVALIFFFMH / VALIF
Capitalization177M2.59B7%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD28.6635.672505%
P/E Ratio10.0710.2199%
Revenue62.9M551M11%
Total Cash25.6MN/A-
Total Debt10M10.9B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMH: Fundamental Ratings
FFMH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
39
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
48
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
48
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
54
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMHVALIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
43%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
11%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
60%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
34%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AUUCX21.16N/A
N/A
AB Select US Equity C
VHCOX90.65N/A
N/A
Vanguard Capital Opportunity Inv
MWOFX64.86N/A
N/A
MFS Global Growth A
MFAIX27.15N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Inst Intl Advtg I
GLNJX21.89N/A
N/A
MFS Global New Discovery R1

FFMH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMH and PONT have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMH and PONT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMH
1D Price
Change %
FFMH100%
N/A
PONT - FFMH
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VALIF - FFMH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MCB - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.79%
CWBC - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.05%
NBGRY - FFMH
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

VALIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALIF and LYBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALIF and LYBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALIF
1D Price
Change %
VALIF100%
N/A
LYBC - VALIF
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.80%
EDVR - VALIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
SFDL - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAFN - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
OAKV - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More