Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFMMX vs GPAFX
FFMMX vs GPAFX Comparison
Open Charts FFMMX vs GPAFX
FFMMX vs GPAFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFMMX vs. GPAFX commentary
Sep 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMMX is a Buy and GPAFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMMX has more cash in the bank: 117B vs. GPAFX (582M). FFMMX pays higher dividends than GPAFX: FFMMX (1.63) vs GPAFX (0.74). FFMMX was incepted earlier than GPAFX: FFMMX (6 years) vs GPAFX (54 years). GPAFX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FFMMX (0.36). GPAFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. FFMMX (30.00). FFMMX has a lower initial minimum investment than GPAFX: FFMMX (250) vs GPAFX (2500). GPAFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.60 vs. FFMMX (5.42). FFMMX return over 5 years is better than : 38.17 vs. GPAFX (17.70).
| FFMMX | GPAFX | FFMMX / GPAFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.89 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.36 | 0.90 | 40% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 54 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.638 | 12.299 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 117B | 582M | 20,103% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.63 | 0.74 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.42 | 8.60 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.12 | 31.59 | 117% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.17 | 17.70 | 216% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.17 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement