FFMR
Price
$67.00
Change
-$0.22 (-0.33%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
440.55M
FIBH
Price
$26.00
Change
+$1.95 (+8.11%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Capitalization
16.67M
Ad is loading...

FFMR vs FIBH

Header iconFFMR vs FIBH Comparison
Open Charts FFMR vs FIBHBanner chart's image
First Farmers Financial
Price$67.00
Change-$0.22 (-0.33%)
Volume$2.1K
Capitalization440.55M
First Bancshares
Price$26.00
Change+$1.95 (+8.11%)
Volume$100
Capitalization16.67M
FFMR vs FIBH Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMR vs. FIBH commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMR is a Hold and FIBH is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMR: $67.00 vs. FIBH: $25.67)
Brand notoriety: FFMR and FIBH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMR: 138% vs. FIBH: 59%
Market capitalization -- FFMR: $440.55M vs. FIBH: $16.67M
FFMR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $440.55M. FIBH’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $16.67M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMR’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFIBH’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FIBH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFMR and FIBH are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FIBH’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FIBH’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMR is a better buy in the short-term than FIBH.

Price Growth

FFMR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +3.08% price change this week, while FIBH (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMR($441M) has a higher market cap than FIBH($16.7M). FFMR YTD gains are higher at: 0.075 vs. FIBH (0.000).
FFMRFIBHFFMR / FIBH
Capitalization441M16.7M2,641%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.0750.000-
P/E Ratio10.41N/A-
Revenue111MN/A-
Total Cash86.7MN/A-
Total Debt61.3MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMR vs FIBH: Fundamental Ratings
FFMR
FIBH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
23
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
14100
SMR RATING
1..100
276
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5350
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3054
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FIBH's Valuation (23) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMR (85). This means that FIBH’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FIBH (100). This means that FFMR’s stock grew significantly faster than FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

FIBH's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (27). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FIBH's Price Growth Rating (50) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (53). This means that FIBH’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the null industry is in the same range as FIBH (54). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to FIBH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMRFIBH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
31%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
37%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
29%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
24%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
35%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
16%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
39%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FIBH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DTGCX31.370.34
+1.10%
BNY Mellon Technology Growth C
IGMAX7.720.07
+0.92%
Voya Global Insights Portfolio ADV
VVIAX68.150.43
+0.63%
Vanguard Value Index Adm
WHGMX16.640.05
+0.30%
Westwood Quality SMidCap Fund Inst
LGVAX97.960.28
+0.29%
ClearBridge Value A

FFMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMR and MBKL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMR and MBKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMR
1D Price
Change %
FFMR100%
-0.33%
MBKL - FFMR
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUT - FFMR
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.74%
SOMC - FFMR
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FFMR
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFMR
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FIBH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FIBH and ITUB have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FIBH and ITUB's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FIBH
1D Price
Change %
FIBH100%
N/A
ITUB - FIBH
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.19%
FOTB - FIBH
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMBF - FIBH
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FGFH - FIBH
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFWC - FIBH
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.27%
More