FFMR
Price
$66.95
Change
-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
468.19M
MBKL
Price
$21.70
Change
+$0.20 (+0.93%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
44.34M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FFMR vs MBKL

Header iconFFMR vs MBKL Comparison
Open Charts FFMR vs MBKLBanner chart's image
First Farmers Financial
Price$66.95
Change-$0.05 (-0.07%)
Volume$5.24K
Capitalization468.19M
MBT Bancshares
Price$21.70
Change+$0.20 (+0.93%)
Volume$300
Capitalization44.34M
FFMR vs MBKL Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFMR vs. MBKL commentary
Aug 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFMR is a Buy and MBKL is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FFMR: $66.95 vs. MBKL: $21.70)
Brand notoriety: FFMR and MBKL are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFMR: 743% vs. MBKL: 62%
Market capitalization -- FFMR: $468.19M vs. MBKL: $44.34M
FFMR [@Regional Banks] is valued at $468.19M. MBKL’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $44.34M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.57B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.02B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFMR’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBKL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFMR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBKL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFMR is a better buy in the long-term than MBKL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFMR’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBKL’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFMR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBKL’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFMR is a better buy in the short-term than MBKL.

Price Growth

FFMR (@Regional Banks) experienced а +1.44% price change this week, while MBKL (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.69%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.89% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFMR($468M) has a higher market cap than MBKL($44.3M). FFMR has higher P/E ratio than MBKL: FFMR (13.50) vs MBKL (7.46). MBKL YTD gains are higher at: 11.146 vs. FFMR (1.515). MBKL has less debt than FFMR: MBKL (10M) vs FFMR (155M). FFMR has higher revenues than MBKL: FFMR (124M) vs MBKL (23.7M).
FFMRMBKLFFMR / MBKL
Capitalization468M44.3M1,056%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD1.51511.14614%
P/E Ratio13.507.46181%
Revenue124M23.7M523%
Total Cash126MN/A-
Total Debt155M10M1,550%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFMR vs MBKL: Fundamental Ratings
FFMR
MBKL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2059
SMR RATING
1..100
3651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5551
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3544
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MBKL's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFMR (68). This means that MBKL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MBKL (59). This means that FFMR’s stock grew somewhat faster than MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's SMR Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (51). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

MBKL's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FFMR (55). This means that MBKL’s stock grew similarly to FFMR’s over the last 12 months.

FFMR's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as MBKL (44). This means that FFMR’s stock grew similarly to MBKL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFMRMBKL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
6%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
26%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
15%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
14%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
25%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
31%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
21%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
21%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
38%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
31%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
40%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FFMR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBKL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NIPMY17.00N/A
N/A
NH Foods Ltd.
SGLFF3.60N/A
N/A
Sgl Group
GRSLF0.12N/A
-1.77%
GR SILVER MNG LTD.
ACSAY15.20-0.40
-2.56%
ACS Actividades De Construccion Y Servicios SA
MAGE0.09N/A
-5.26%
Magellan Copper and Gold Corp.

FFMR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFMR and MBKL have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFMR and MBKL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFMR
1D Price
Change %
FFMR100%
N/A
MBKL - FFMR
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BKUT - FFMR
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOMC - FFMR
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - FFMR
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FIBH - FFMR
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.03%
More

MBKL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBKL has been loosely correlated with CMGGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBKL jumps, then CMGGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBKL
1D Price
Change %
MBKL100%
N/A
CMGGF - MBKL
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
HRGG - MBKL
33%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFMR - MBKL
31%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CRZBF - MBKL
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCBN - MBKL
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More