Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLAX
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$13.11
Change+$0.02 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.26B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.41
Change-$0.06 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.17B
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Hold and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12.2B vs. FFNCX (2.26B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLAX (3.35) vs FFNCX (1.43). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNCX (17 years) vs HBLAX (18 years). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.66 vs. HBLAX (5.97). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 14.38 vs. HBLAX (8.41).
| FFNCX | HBLAX | FFNCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.707 | 1.622 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.26B | 12.2B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 3.35 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.66 | 5.97 | 145% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.56 | 1.34 | 192% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.38 | 8.41 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 30.28 | 33.13 | 91% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers