Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLAX
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$13.09
Change-$0.03 (-0.23%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.07
Change-$0.04 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Nov 15, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a StrongBuy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12.5B vs. FFNCX (2.25B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLAX (3.35) vs FFNCX (1.43). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNCX (17 years) vs HBLAX (18 years). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 57.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). HBLAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.75 vs. FFNCX (13.22). HBLAX (15.60) and FFNCX (15.31) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFNCX | HBLAX | FFNCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.367 | 8.366 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.25B | 12.5B | 18% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.43 | 3.35 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 15.75 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | -3.10 | -0.96 | 323% |
| Returns for 5 years | 15.31 | 15.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.63 | 37.41 | 71% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...