Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLAX
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$12.79
Change-$0.20 (-1.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.29
Change-$0.22 (-1.52%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.99B
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 12B vs. FFNCX (2.22B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FFNCX (1.69). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNCX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FFNCX (1.53) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). HBLAX (4.60) and FFNCX (4.51) have marching annual gain over last year. FFNCX (29.56) and HBLAX (28.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFNCX | HBLAX | FFNCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.89 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.89 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.776 | 3.230 | 24% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 12B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 3.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.51 | 4.60 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.47 | 4.33 | 57% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.56 | 28.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 26.62 | 34.56 | 77% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...