Ad is loading...
FFNCX vs HBLAX
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNCX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% C
Price$12.81
Change+$0.12 (+0.95%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.21
Change+$0.12 (+0.85%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.55B
FFNCX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNCX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNCX is a StrongBuy and HBLAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FFNCX (2.22B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNCX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FFNCX (1.69). FFNCX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNCX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FFNCX (1.53) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNCX (21.00). FFNCX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNCX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNCX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNCX (500). FFNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.08 vs. HBLAX (3.15). FFNCX return over 5 years is better than : 19.18 vs. HBLAX (16.27).
| FFNCX | HBLAX | FFNCX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.89 | 172% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.53 | 0.89 | 172% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.343 | 0.242 | -555% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 11.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.69 | 3.37 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.08 | 3.15 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.65 | 4.50 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 19.18 | 16.27 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 23.06 | 29.43 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers