Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFNTX vs HBLAX
FFNTX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% M
Price$14.04
Change-$0.05 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.36B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$15.02
Change-$0.07 (-0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
FFNTX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLAX commentary
Sep 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a Hold and HBLAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLAX (3.28) vs FFNTX (2.07). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNTX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FFNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNTX (13.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFNTX (4%) vs FFNTX (4%). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNTX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNTX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNTX (500). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.18 vs. HBLAX (2.32). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 23.76 vs. HBLAX (18.43).
| FFNTX | HBLAX | FFNTX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.956 | 8.268 | 120% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.36B | N/A | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.07 | 3.28 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.18 | 2.32 | 352% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.20 | 24.48 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.76 | 18.43 | 129% |
| Returns for 10 years | 54.24 | 49.93 | 109% |