Ad is loading...
FFNTX vs HBLAX
FFNTX vs HBLAX Comparison
Open Charts FFNTX vs HBLAX
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 40% M
Price$12.64
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.22B
Hartford Balanced Income A
Price$14.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets11.53B
FFNTX vs HBLAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFNTX vs. HBLAX commentary
Apr 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNTX is a Buy and HBLAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HBLAX has more cash in the bank: 11.5B vs. FFNTX (2.22B). HBLAX pays higher dividends than FFNTX: HBLAX (3.37) vs FFNTX (2.20). FFNTX was incepted earlier than HBLAX: FFNTX (18 years) vs HBLAX (19 years). FFNTX (1.03) is less costly to investors than HBLAX (0.89). HBLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FFNTX (21.00). HBLAX initial investment is less costly to investors than FFNTX (4%) vs FFNTX (4%). FFNTX has a lower initial minimum investment than HBLAX: FFNTX (0) vs HBLAX (2000). HBLAX IRA initial investment is lower compared to FFNTX: HBLAX (2000) vs FFNTX (500). FFNTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.46 vs. HBLAX (4.03). FFNTX return over 5 years is better than : 21.07 vs. HBLAX (15.03).
| FFNTX | HBLAX | FFNTX / HBLAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.03 | 0.89 | 116% |
| Fund Existence | 18 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.915 | -0.042 | 4,520% |
| Front Load | 4% | 6% | 64% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 2000 | 25% |
| Net Assets | 2.22B | 11.5B | 19% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.20 | 3.37 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.46 | 4.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.21 | 3.30 | 127% |
| Returns for 5 years | 21.07 | 15.03 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 28.21 | 29.16 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers