FFNW
Price
$22.56
Change
-$0.25 (-1.10%)
Updated
Apr 21 closing price
Capitalization
189.91M
75 days until earnings call
PCLB
Price
$32.01
Change
-$2.10 (-6.16%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.84M
Ad is loading...

FFNW vs PCLB

Header iconFFNW vs PCLB Comparison
Open Charts FFNW vs PCLBBanner chart's image
First Financial Northwest
Price$22.56
Change-$0.25 (-1.10%)
Volume$1.54M
Capitalization189.91M
Pinnacle Bancshares
Price$32.01
Change-$2.10 (-6.16%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization17.84M
FFNW vs PCLB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFNW vs. PCLB commentary
May 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNW is a StrongBuy and PCLB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 10, 2025
Stock price -- (FFNW: $0.56 vs. PCLB: $32.01)
Brand notoriety: FFNW and PCLB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFNW: 283% vs. PCLB: 200%
Market capitalization -- FFNW: $189.91M vs. PCLB: $17.84M
FFNW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.91M. PCLB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $17.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFNW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePCLB’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FFNW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • PCLB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FFNW and PCLB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFNW’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFNW’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

FFNW (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PCLB (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.22%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFNW($190M) has a higher market cap than PCLB($17.8M). PCLB YTD gains are higher at: 15.625 vs. FFNW (3.963). PCLB has less debt than FFNW: PCLB (9.39M) vs FFNW (128M). FFNW has higher revenues than PCLB: FFNW (43.3M) vs PCLB (8.19M).
FFNWPCLBFFNW / PCLB
Capitalization190M17.8M1,067%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.96315.62525%
P/E Ratio30.00N/A-
Revenue43.3M8.19M529%
Total Cash8.07MN/A-
Total Debt128M9.39M1,363%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFNW vs PCLB: Fundamental Ratings
FFNW
PCLB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3432
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
100
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1462
SMR RATING
1..100
2912
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5142
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

PCLB's Valuation (88) in the null industry is in the same range as FFNW (100) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PCLB’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PCLB (62) in the null industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as FFNW (29) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PCLB’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

PCLB's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FFNW (51) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that PCLB’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as PCLB (16) in the null industry. This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to PCLB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
36%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
36%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 25 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 19 days ago
33%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TSLA298.2613.44
+4.72%
Tesla
GME27.540.76
+2.84%
GameStop Corp
AAPL198.531.04
+0.53%
Apple
SPY564.34-0.72
-0.13%
SPDR® S&P 500® ETF
BTC.X102970.850000-270.609380
-0.26%
Bitcoin cryptocurrency

FFNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFNW has been loosely correlated with TSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFNW jumps, then TSBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFNW
1D Price
Change %
FFNW100%
N/A
TSBK - FFNW
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
HTH - FFNW
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.46%
SMBC - FFNW
39%
Loosely correlated
-0.08%
PFS - FFNW
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.52%
BPRN - FFNW
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.67%
More

PCLB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that PCLB and SCGLF have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that PCLB and SCGLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PCLB
1D Price
Change %
PCLB100%
-6.16%
SCGLF - PCLB
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CCYY - PCLB
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WBBW - PCLB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFNW - PCLB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SUTNY - PCLB
20%
Poorly correlated
+3.59%
More