FFNW
Price
$22.63
Change
+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
189.91M
12 days until earnings call
SMBC
Price
$47.36
Change
+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Updated
Apr 11 closing price
Capitalization
497.01M
16 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FFNW vs SMBC

Header iconFFNW vs SMBC Comparison
Open Charts FFNW vs SMBCBanner chart's image
First Financial Northwest
Price$22.63
Change+$0.02 (+0.09%)
Volume$55.33K
Capitalization189.91M
Southern Missouri Ban
Price$47.36
Change+$0.06 (+0.13%)
Volume$19.32K
Capitalization497.01M
FFNW vs SMBC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FFNW vs. SMBC commentary
Apr 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFNW is a Buy and SMBC is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FFNW: $22.63 vs. SMBC: $47.36)
Brand notoriety: FFNW and SMBC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FFNW: 113% vs. SMBC: 71%
Market capitalization -- FFNW: $189.91M vs. SMBC: $497.01M
FFNW [@Regional Banks] is valued at $189.91M. SMBC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $497.01M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FFNW’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSMBC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FFNW’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SMBC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FFNW is a better buy in the long-term than SMBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFNW’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMBC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FFNW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SMBC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFNW is a better buy in the short-term than SMBC.

Price Growth

FFNW (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.62% price change this week, while SMBC (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.96%.

Reported Earning Dates

FFNW is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

SMBC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMBC($497M) has a higher market cap than FFNW($190M). FFNW has higher P/E ratio than SMBC: FFNW (30.00) vs SMBC (11.19). FFNW YTD gains are higher at: 4.286 vs. SMBC (-17.133). FFNW has less debt than SMBC: FFNW (128M) vs SMBC (136M). SMBC has higher revenues than FFNW: SMBC (167M) vs FFNW (43.3M).
FFNWSMBCFFNW / SMBC
Capitalization190M497M38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.286-17.133-25%
P/E Ratio30.0011.19268%
Revenue43.3M167M26%
Total Cash8.07MN/A-
Total Debt128M136M94%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FFNW vs SMBC: Fundamental Ratings
FFNW
SMBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
97
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
66
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1341
SMR RATING
1..100
2811
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4159
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
243
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMBC's Valuation (66) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFNW (99). This means that SMBC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (41). This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

SMBC's SMR Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as FFNW (28). This means that SMBC’s stock grew similarly to FFNW’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as SMBC (59). This means that FFNW’s stock grew similarly to SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

FFNW's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMBC (43). This means that FFNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMBC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFNWSMBC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
28%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFNW
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FWDDX10.590.24
+2.32%
American Funds Dvlpg Wld Gr&Inc 529-F-2
WLGRX29.70N/A
N/A
Macquarie Large Cap Growth Fund R
SCRSX9.87N/A
N/A
Bernstein Small Cap Core SCB
DIVHX25.14N/A
N/A
Cutler Equity Fund
WFICX12.42N/A
N/A
North Star Small Cap Value Institutional

FFNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFNW has been loosely correlated with TSBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFNW jumps, then TSBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFNW
1D Price
Change %
FFNW100%
+0.09%
TSBK - FFNW
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
HTH - FFNW
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.32%
SMBC - FFNW
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
AMAL - FFNW
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.95%
BPRN - FFNW
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.07%
More

SMBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMBC has been closely correlated with QCRH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMBC jumps, then QCRH could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMBC
1D Price
Change %
SMBC100%
+0.13%
QCRH - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.61%
CTBI - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
THFF - SMBC
85%
Closely correlated
-1.04%
FMBH - SMBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.39%
MBWM - SMBC
84%
Closely correlated
-0.77%
More