Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOG vs IWF
FFOG vs IWF Comparison
Open Charts FFOG vs IWF
Franklin Focused Growth ETF
Price$44.58
Change+$0.23 (+0.52%)
Volume$22.2K
Net Assets155.03M
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Price$439.88
Change+$2.03 (+0.46%)
Volume$1.04M
Net Assets114.27B
FFOG vs IWF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOG vs. IWF commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOG is a Buy and IWF is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
IWF has more net assets: 114B vs. FFOG (155M). FFOG has a higher annual dividend yield than IWF: FFOG (11.562) vs IWF (9.761). FFOG was incepted earlier than IWF: FFOG (9 years) vs IWF (25 years). IWF (0.19) has a lower expense ratio than FFOG (0.55). FFOG has a higher turnover IWF (12.00) vs IWF (12.00).
| FFOG | IWF | FFOG / IWF | |
| Gain YTD | 11.562 | 9.761 | 118% |
| Net Assets | 155M | 114B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.19 | 289% |
| Turnover | 30.04 | 12.00 | 250% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.42 | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 25 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FFOG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 85% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 71% | 16 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 77% | 1 day ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 88% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
FFOG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFOG has been closely correlated with NVDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FFOG jumps, then NVDA could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFOG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFOG | 100% | +0.52% | ||
| NVDA - FFOG | 84% Closely correlated | -0.14% | ||
| META - FFOG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.30% | ||
| AMZN - FFOG | 81% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| MSFT - FFOG | 79% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| TSM - FFOG | 76% Closely correlated | +1.66% | ||
More | ||||
IWF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IWF has been closely correlated with CDNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if IWF jumps, then CDNS could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To IWF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | 100% | +0.46% | ||
| CDNS - IWF | 79% Closely correlated | +2.33% | ||
| SNPS - IWF | 78% Closely correlated | -1.33% | ||
| MSFT - IWF | 77% Closely correlated | +0.55% | ||
| AMZN - IWF | 74% Closely correlated | -0.34% | ||
| KLAC - IWF | 73% Closely correlated | -0.23% | ||
More | ||||