Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOLX vs RBHTX
FFOLX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOLX vs. RBHTX commentary
Aug 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOLX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 41.9B vs. FFOLX (24.1B). FFOLX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: FFOLX (1.84) vs RBHTX (0.42). FFOLX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: FFOLX (10 years) vs RBHTX (19 years). RBHTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FFOLX (0.08). FFOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). RBHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOLX: RBHTX (250) vs FFOLX (5000000). FFOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 20.45 vs. RBHTX (17.26). FFOLX return over 5 years is better than : 61.45 vs. RBHTX (35.77).
| FFOLX | RBHTX | FFOLX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 11.256 | 10.599 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.1B | 41.9B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.84 | 0.42 | 436% |
| Returns for 1 year | 20.45 | 17.26 | 118% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.16 | 31.16 | 145% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.45 | 35.77 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | 99.71 | 73.99 | 135% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers