Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFOLX vs RBHTX
FFOLX vs RBHTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFOLX vs. RBHTX commentary
Sep 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFOLX is a Hold and RBHTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RBHTX has more cash in the bank: 43.1B vs. FFOLX (24.8B). FFOLX pays higher dividends than RBHTX: FFOLX (1.79) vs RBHTX (0.41). FFOLX was incepted earlier than RBHTX: FFOLX (10 years) vs RBHTX (19 years). RBHTX (1.46) is less costly to investors than FFOLX (0.08). FFOLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 13.00 vs. RBHTX (5.00). RBHTX has a lower initial minimum investment than FFOLX: RBHTX (250) vs FFOLX (5000000). FFOLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.50 vs. RBHTX (15.79). FFOLX return over 5 years is better than : 67.95 vs. RBHTX (41.37).
| FFOLX | RBHTX | FFOLX / RBHTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.08 | 1.46 | 5% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.193 | 14.132 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 24.8B | 43.1B | 58% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.41 | 433% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.50 | 15.79 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 54.17 | 37.80 | 143% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.95 | 41.37 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 118.75 | 89.52 | 133% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers