FFPP vs PAYS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFPP is a Hold and PAYS is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FFPP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- PAYS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FFPP’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAYS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FFPP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
- PAYS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
FFPP (@Packaged Software) experienced а +200.30% price change this week, while PAYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -2.51% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +2.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +14.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
PAYS is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Packaged Software (+2.25% weekly)Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
| FFPP | PAYS | FFPP / PAYS | |
| Capitalization | N/A | 194M | - |
| EBITDA | N/A | 3.86M | - |
| Gain YTD | -23.077 | 11.071 | -208% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 34.25 | - |
| Revenue | N/A | 47.3M | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | 17M | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | 3.31M | - |
FFPP | PAYS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 99 | 68 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 15 Undervalued | 66 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 40 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFPP's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYS (66) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
FFPP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYS (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew similarly to PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
PAYS's SMR Rating (27) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
FFPP's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYS (63) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew similarly to PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
PAYS's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
| FFPP | PAYS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 53% | 2 days ago 84% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% | 2 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 17 days ago 81% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 83% |
FFPP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFPP has been loosely correlated with PYFRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFPP jumps, then PYFRF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
| PYFRF - FFPP | 47% Loosely correlated | -4.64% | ||
| PAYS - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.89% | ||
| CCOEF - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| KGDEY - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| SBIG - FFPP | 9% Poorly correlated | +2.17% | ||
More | ||||
PAYS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYS has been loosely correlated with ONTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYS jumps, then ONTF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAYS | 100% | -1.89% | ||
| ONTF - PAYS | 40% Loosely correlated | -3.75% | ||
| CLSK - PAYS | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.96% | ||
| PLTK - PAYS | 37% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| BIGC - PAYS | 36% Loosely correlated | -1.58% | ||
| EB - PAYS | 35% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
More | ||||