It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FFPP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePAYS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
PAYS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
FFPP (@Packaged Software) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while PAYS (@Packaged Software) price change was -15.08% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.33%.
PAYS is expected to report earnings on Mar 25, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
FFPP | PAYS | FFPP / PAYS | |
Capitalization | N/A | 194M | - |
EBITDA | N/A | 3.86M | - |
Gain YTD | -23.154 | 20.714 | -112% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 34.25 | - |
Revenue | N/A | 47.3M | - |
Total Cash | N/A | 17M | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 3.31M | - |
FFPP | PAYS | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 67 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | 27 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FFPP's Valuation (14) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAYS (67) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
FFPP's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYS (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew similarly to PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
PAYS's SMR Rating (27) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew significantly faster than FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
FFPP's Price Growth Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as PAYS (64) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that FFPP’s stock grew similarly to PAYS’s over the last 12 months.
PAYS's P/E Growth Rating (99) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as FFPP (100) in the null industry. This means that PAYS’s stock grew similarly to FFPP’s over the last 12 months.
PAYS | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 7 days ago80% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago74% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago79% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago84% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago83% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago81% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago86% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
NQGAX | 34.74 | -0.12 | -0.34% |
Nuveen Global Equity Income A | |||
ABRWX | 17.36 | -0.14 | -0.80% |
DSS AmericaFirstMonthlyRisk-OnRisk-Off I | |||
AIOIX | 9.18 | -0.08 | -0.86% |
American Century International Opps Inv | |||
AQEAX | 16.47 | -0.19 | -1.14% |
Columbia Disciplined Core A | |||
VRMGX | 63.91 | -1.32 | -2.02% |
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Growth R6 |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FFPP has been loosely correlated with PYFRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FFPP jumps, then PYFRF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FFPP | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
FFPP | 100% | N/A | ||
PYFRF - FFPP | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.66% | ||
PAYS - FFPP | 22% Poorly correlated | -4.52% | ||
CCOEF - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
KGDEY - FFPP | 20% Poorly correlated | +5.77% | ||
SBIG - FFPP | 9% Poorly correlated | +50.00% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAYS has been loosely correlated with ONTF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PAYS jumps, then ONTF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PAYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PAYS | 100% | -4.52% | ||
ONTF - PAYS | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.46% | ||
CLSK - PAYS | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.36% | ||
EB - PAYS | 37% Loosely correlated | -6.91% | ||
BIGC - PAYS | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.10% | ||
UPBD - PAYS | 36% Loosely correlated | -2.03% | ||
More |