Ad is loading...
FFQAX vs LANSX
FFQAX vs LANSX Comparison
Open Charts FFQAX vs LANSX
Franklin Federal Tax Free Income A
Price$10.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.03B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free A
Price$10.14
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.59B
FFQAX vs LANSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFQAX vs. LANSX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFQAX is a Hold and LANSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFQAX has more cash in the bank: 8.03B vs. LANSX (4.59B). LANSX (3.77) and FFQAX (3.59) have matching dividends . FFQAX was incepted earlier than LANSX: FFQAX (7 years) vs LANSX (41 years). FFQAX (0.79) and LANSX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . LANSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFQAX (15.32). FFQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than LANSX (2%) vs LANSX (2%). FFQAX (1000) and LANSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.97 vs. LANSX (0.66). LANSX return over 5 years is better than : 5.58 vs. FFQAX (-0.46).
| FFQAX | LANSX | FFQAX / LANSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.545 | -1.809 | 85% |
| Front Load | 4% | 2% | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.03B | 4.59B | 175% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.59 | 3.77 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.97 | 0.66 | 148% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.25 | 7.82 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.46 | 5.58 | -8% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 10.87 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...