Ad is loading...
FFQAX vs LANSX
FFQAX vs LANSX Comparison
Open Charts FFQAX vs LANSX
Franklin Federal Tax Free Income A
Price$10.74
Change-$0.06 (-0.56%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.35B
Lord Abbett National Tax Free A
Price$10.38
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets4.75B
FFQAX vs LANSX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFQAX vs. LANSX commentary
Mar 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFQAX is a Hold and LANSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFQAX has more cash in the bank: 8.36B vs. LANSX (4.75B). LANSX (3.61) and FFQAX (3.47) have matching dividends . FFQAX was incepted earlier than LANSX: FFQAX (7 years) vs LANSX (41 years). FFQAX (0.79) and LANSX (0.78) have similar cost to investors . LANSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 27.00 vs. FFQAX (15.32). FFQAX initial investment is less costly to investors than LANSX (2%) vs LANSX (2%). FFQAX (1000) and LANSX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 2.79 vs. LANSX (2.41). LANSX return over 5 years is better than : 4.40 vs. FFQAX (1.16).
| FFQAX | LANSX | FFQAX / LANSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.78 | 101% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.476 | 0.162 | 294% |
| Front Load | 4% | 2% | 167% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 8.36B | 4.75B | 176% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.47 | 3.61 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.79 | 2.41 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.10 | 1.81 | 6% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.16 | 4.40 | 26% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 12.10 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...