Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRAX vs PFFRX
FFRAX vs PFFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRAX vs. PFFRX commentary
Oct 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRAX is a Hold and PFFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRAX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. PFFRX (5.21B). FFRAX (7.28) and PFFRX (7.28) have matching dividends . FFRAX was incepted earlier than PFFRX: FFRAX (25 years) vs PFFRX (15 years). FFRAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PFFRX (0.69). PFFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 107.30 vs. FFRAX (41.00). FFRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PFFRX: FFRAX (0) vs PFFRX (2500). PFFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.89 vs. FFRAX (5.57). PFFRX (36.84) and FFRAX (36.03) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRAX | PFFRX | FFRAX / PFFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.69 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.69 | 148% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.461 | 4.612 | 75% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 5.21B | 292% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.28 | 7.28 | 100% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.57 | 6.89 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.75 | 31.64 | 91% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.03 | 36.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 60.34 | 64.48 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers