Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRAX vs PRFRX
FFRAX vs PRFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRAX vs. PRFRX commentary
Sep 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRAX is a Buy and PRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRAX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. PRFRX (4.36B). FFRAX (7.38) and PRFRX (7.25) have matching dividends . FFRAX was incepted earlier than PRFRX: FFRAX (25 years) vs PRFRX (14 years). FFRAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than PRFRX (0.76). PRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRAX (41.00). FFRAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFRX: FFRAX (0) vs PRFRX (2500). PRFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.43 vs. FFRAX (6.70). PRFRX (36.17) and FFRAX (35.92) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRAX | PRFRX | FFRAX / PRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.76 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.76 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.317 | 4.390 | 76% |
| Front Load | 3% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 4.36B | 349% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.38 | 7.25 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.70 | 7.43 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.02 | 28.88 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.92 | 36.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.91 | 60.56 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement