Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRCX vs FFRHX
FFRCX vs FFRHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRCX vs. FFRHX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRCX is a Hold and FFRHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRCX (15.2B) and FFRHX (15.2B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFRHX pays higher dividends than FFRCX: FFRHX (7.57) vs FFRCX (6.53). FFRCX was incepted earlier than FFRHX: FFRCX (25 years) vs FFRHX (23 years). FFRCX (1.77) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRCX (41.00) and FFRHX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFRCX (0) and FFRHX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFRCX (500) and FFRHX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.76 vs. FFRCX (4.66). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 38.06 vs. FFRCX (30.98).
| FFRCX | FFRHX | FFRCX / FFRHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.73 | 242% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.77 | 0.73 | 242% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.765 | 3.571 | 77% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 15.2B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.53 | 7.57 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.66 | 5.76 | 81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 25.72 | 29.73 | 86% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.98 | 38.06 | 81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.67 | 65.11 | 75% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement