Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs FFRTX
FFRHX vs FFRTX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. FFRTX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and FFRTX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX (16B) and FFRTX (16B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . FFRHX (8.13) and FFRTX (7.84) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than FFRTX: FFRHX (23 years) vs FFRTX (25 years). FFRTX (1.02) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). FFRHX (41.00) and FFRTX (41.00) have comparable annual turnover. FFRHX (0) and FFRTX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FFRHX (500) and FFRTX (500) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. FFRHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.35 vs. FFRTX (5.05). FFRHX (44.39) and FFRTX (42.28) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | FFRTX | FFRHX / FFRTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.02 | 72% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 1.02 | 72% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.937 | -1.010 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 3% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | 500 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 16B | 16B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 7.84 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.35 | 5.05 | 106% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.77 | 19.75 | 105% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.39 | 42.28 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.03 | 50.27 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...