Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PRFRX
FFRHX vs PRFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PRFRX commentary
Jun 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. PRFRX (4.23B). FFRHX (7.97) and PRFRX (7.59) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than PRFRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PRFRX (14 years). PRFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFRX: FFRHX (0) vs PRFRX (2500). PRFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.95 vs. FFRHX (6.25). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 39.15 vs. PRFRX (36.79).
| FFRHX | PRFRX | FFRHX / PRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.192 | 2.094 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 14.8B | 4.23B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.97 | 7.59 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.25 | 6.95 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 27.38 | 28.21 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.15 | 36.79 | 106% |
| Returns for 10 years | 58.51 | 56.68 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement