Ad is loading...
FFRHX vs PRFRX
FFRHX vs PRFRX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PRFRX commentary
Apr 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Buy and PRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 16B vs. PRFRX (4.04B). FFRHX (8.13) and PRFRX (7.88) have matching dividends . FFRHX was incepted earlier than PRFRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PRFRX (14 years). PRFRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FFRHX (0.73). PRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFRX: FFRHX (0) vs PRFRX (2500). PRFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.51 vs. FFRHX (5.47). FFRHX return over 5 years is better than : 44.55 vs. PRFRX (40.03).
| FFRHX | PRFRX | FFRHX / PRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.77 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.828 | -0.115 | 723% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 16B | 4.04B | 396% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 8.13 | 7.88 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.47 | 6.51 | 84% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.03 | 21.58 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 44.55 | 40.03 | 111% |
| Returns for 10 years | 55.04 | 53.55 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers