Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FFRHX vs PRFRX
FFRHX vs PRFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FFRHX vs. PRFRX commentary
Oct 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FFRHX is a Hold and PRFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFRHX has more cash in the bank: 15.2B vs. PRFRX (4.34B). FFRHX pays higher dividends than PRFRX: FFRHX (7.57) vs PRFRX (7.19). FFRHX was incepted earlier than PRFRX: FFRHX (23 years) vs PRFRX (14 years). PRFRX (0.76) and FFRHX (0.73) have similar cost to investors . PRFRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.90 vs. FFRHX (41.00). FFRHX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRFRX: FFRHX (0) vs PRFRX (2500). PRFRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.78 vs. FFRHX (5.76). FFRHX (38.06) and PRFRX (36.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FFRHX | PRFRX | FFRHX / PRFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.73 | 0.76 | 96% |
| Fund Existence | 23 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.571 | 4.534 | 79% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 500 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 15.2B | 4.34B | 350% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 7.57 | 7.19 | 105% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.76 | 6.78 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.73 | 30.97 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.06 | 36.34 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.11 | 61.56 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers